Christie never intended Miss Marple to rival Poirot in the publics affections, but this spinster sleuth soon proved a hit with the public. Here's the place to discuss her stories - but beware spoilers!
If you can't find your favourite Miss Marple story, don't worry - more will be added shortly.
Warning: These discussions may contain spoilers!
Login or register to add posts and reply
Roger Ackroyd I think you have Great Taste when It comes to Agatha Christie Adaptations, I have the same habit as you although I have to wait until I have a big enough window to watch A Murder Is Announced and Body In The Library as my Adaptations are on Video and those 2 are each on 2 Videos
hi Roger Ackroyd1926 - quite so. I had been puzzling over "A Mouse" since I got my second-hand copy many years ago. I had often wondered.. was Gwenda as a toddler watching serious incidents that she didn't understand, thus she was like a mouse in a busy household full of humans? or was Gwenda spooked by any particular noise inside the house, noise that could be attributed to a mouse? I was sooo puzzled.. lol. 
The Miss Marples are being republished by HarperCollins US on April 12th - I'm happy to report that Christie's US readers will now be able to read THE MOVING FINGER in its full length, and that Chapter 1 of SLEEPING MURDER has been corrected to "A House" - the 1976 Dodd, Mead edition and subsequent paperback reprints titled it "A Mouse"!!!
After finishing my re-read of SLEEPING MURDER, I re-watched the Joan Hickson TV film, as I often do after re-reading a Miss Marple novel. The story was somewhat streamlined, but it's still faithful to the novel and, for me, is right up there with A MURDER IS ANNOUNCED, NEMESIS and THE MOVING FINGER as one of the very best adaptations.
I'm enjoying my re-read of SLEEPING MURDER - although I've re-read parts of it over the year (and watched the Joan Hickson TV movie several times)s, I haven't re-read it from beginning to end since it first appeared in the US in September 1976 - coincidentally, it was the last Christie novel left for me to read - perfect timing! I think I gobbled it up in one evening back then (almost certainly because I was anticipating Miss Marple's 'exit,'), but it's taking me a bit longer this time around.
It's still something of a mystery to myself and others why Christie held this one back - while it's certainly Good Christie, there's no reason it shouldn't have fit nicely in the gap between THE MOVING FINGER (1942/43) and A MURDER IS ANNOUNCED (1950) as there's no reason to regard it as "Miss Marple's Last Case" (do current editions even still carry that tag-line?); such a description would have been much more suitable for the elegiac NEMESIS. Granted, the 'Christie time-line' is sometimes a little vague as to when some novels are set, but although Miss Marple's friend Dolly Bantry had been widowed by the time of THE MIRROR CRACK'D FROM SIDE TO SIDE (1962), her 'late' husband Colonel Bantry makes an appearance in SLEEPING MURDER!
Miss Quin, of course you can call me knotty :)
Yes, Death on the Nile was in the first 3 AC novels I read. I enjoyed it IMMENSELY and I adore the Suchet movie adaptation. I don't enjoy the Ustinov adaptation and the snake scene is just horrible. David Suchet to me is perfection as Poirot. I can't imagine anyone else doing better justice to the character.
Have you read Death on The Nile, Knotty? Excellent book, a real favourite of mine. BTW can I call you Knotty?
Too true MissQuin. I've been too influenced by the film adaption of DotN.
I actually don't think that the relationship betweeen the Allertons, was anything other that a caring mother and son. It's only the Suchet version that gives that impression (shudders).
Interesting points about Dr. Kennedy's relationship with Helen. I've only read Sleeping Murder once but I didn't get the impression that he had actually ever molested Helen but that he had some sick "obcession" with her where he needed to keep her all to himself. Whether or not he actually "acted" on his obcession is left to the reader's imagination which is much more appealing to me than to be told one way or the other. It keeps you thinking about it "did he?" or "didn't he?".
I don't think this novel was kept back as too racy for the time due to the dubious nature of Dr. Kennedy's relations with his sister. AC had already wrote of dubious inappropriate relations before when she wrote Mrs Allerton and Tim's relationship in Death on the Nile. IMO that relationship screamed of incest much more than Dr. Kennedy's and Helen's did.
My best guess would be that AC recognized Sleeping Murder as a really great THRILLER and decided on completion that it would be perfect as Miss Marple's final act of detection.
Thanx a lot 4 the ideas GKCfan.
I don’t think Your version is correct either. The meeting at the surgery was only mentioned by Dr Kennedy but the fact that Halliday saw Helen dead on the bed & believed he had killed her is confirmed by the clinic director. This is the biggest problem 4 me cause anything could happen after that. How could Dr Kennedy b sure he’d b able 2 extract the body with no additional witnesses & continue with the no-body-no-crime plan?
The idea that the body also spent time in a hiding place (a 3rd place!) b4 it was buried is introduced by Ms Marple at an early point & can b disregarded.
This part isn’t explained at all.
The 2nd murder didn't need much explanation once we knew the perpetrator...
I'm afraid that isn't what happened. First of all, Gwenda's Dad probably never believed that he killed Helen. He doesn't mention having killed her in any of his diaries. Miss Marple believes that the doctor simply made up the hallucination for his own purposes and everything he told Gwenda and Giles was tainted to promote the story that Helen was a nymphomaniac who left him and that Gwenda's Dad was insane. Halliday did have a bit of a breakdown after Helen disappeared- he genuinely believed she'd left him. Miss Marple suggests that out of blind hatred, Dr. Kennedy gave Halliday drugs that made him hallucinate, before eventually poisoning him and making it look like a suicide, but this cannot be proved.
The sequence of events is this. Dr. Kennedy kills Helen. Little Gwenda sees the dead body, monkey's paws, and hears the Malfi line. She runs away. The doctor buries the body, packs a suitcase full of Helen's clothes, and disposes of the suitcase. He forges some letters later in case anyone wonders. Halliday collapses after he is told that Helen left him, and he goes to a sanitarium where he may have met the fate described earlier. Gwenda is sent to live with relatives in Australia. One servant who witnessed something is sent back to the Continent, along with a prescription filled by Dr. Kennedy. One of the pills probably contains poison, the maid takes it and dies. No foul play is suspected. Years pass, grown-up Gwenda returns to the house, starts remembering, and the investigation starts. A maid who witnessed something comes back to explain what she say, but Kennedy strangles her before she can reveal incriminating information. Kennedy poisons the Reeds' brandy, but the housekeeper drinks some first. Fortunately, she survives. Kennedy then tries to strangle Gwenda, but Miss Marple stops him and solves the mystery.
I have a little problem.
I finished the book & re-read sum of the descriptions & here’s what I understand happened:
Mr Halliday woke up next 2 his dead wife. He wiped his nose, whatever, & headed str8 4 Dr Kennedy’s surgery. Meanwhile, Dr Kennedy was hiding in the house waiting 4 him 2 do just that! He then hid the body, placed the note etc. & met him there. They came back 2gether & he spent sum time convincing Mr Halliday that it was all a hallucination. After that every1 in the house slept peacefully while Dr Kennedy was digging.
This has a lot of weak spots which probably means that I didn't get it correctly. Any different ideas as 2 what happened after Helen's murder?
LOL, MissQuin, I did the same thing yesterday - read the Wiki entry for Duchess of Malfi! I'm kind of glad I knew nothing of the work when I read Sleeping Murder as it might have made me jump to the correct conclusion too quickly. And even though I know some people like figuring out whodunnit early, I for one don't. I did it in Mirror Crack'd because I work in the medical field and *that certain clue* just popped right out at me.
But yeah, Dr. Kennedy had some very wrong feelings for his sister but let's hope he didn't act on them. It's horrible enough how it all ended for Helen but yet not as horrible as being molested by your own brother. *shudder*
SPOILERS!!!! I always thought that Dr Kennedy's feelings for his sister weren't healthy. So I looked up Duchess Of Malfi.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Duchess_of_Malfi
"Cover her face. Mine eyes dazzle. She died young." Was quoted after Ferdinand saw the body of his sister who he had murdered due to an incestrous passion. I think Christie chose this quote as a hint to the murder motive. Why else would the story have said it? It's a key moment to the story.
I beleive that Dr Kennedy would have been emotional abusive, not physically. It was one sided incest, Helen didn't have romantic feelings for her brother. He hurt her because she didn't love him back, he killed her for revenge for not loving him. It's a dark subject for a AC book.
Personally, I have never read the relationship between Dr Kennedy and Helen as incestuous but maybe that was just me not wanting to think of a darker, much more disturbing reason for his behaviour. I think a loveless marriage to the ever-doting Walter Fane would have been preferable to returning home to a physically abusive brother IF this was how Dr Kennedy was treating her. In fact, ANY option would have been better. I'm sure, once she married Gwenda's father after returning to this country, she would have stayed well away from Dillmouth if there was ANY chance of being abused again. I think Dr Kennedy DID use mental abuse - which is frightening enough to live with - but I think he was so abusive in this way BECAUSE he had no physical release for his feelings. Perhaps I'm being naive reading it in this way but that is how it has always seemed to me.
SPOILERS!!!!
And he gets more sinister once you know what he's been up to when you re-read or re-listen to the story. How he can calmly sit with Gwen & Giles, waiting for Lily who will never arrive, it's really creepy.
Spoilers In the Hickson adapt Jane Marple is so sweet and caring towards troubled Gwenda. Patient, understanding, like someones favourite great auntie. But at the same time, prepared to catch a dangerous murderer! The scene at the end is scary, as it should be.
The McEwan adpt is annoying! Everyone gathered in a room, everyone a suspect blah blah blah! Not scary at all.
Well put Miss E. Helen was quite normal and showed no signs of emotinal damage.
I get cross when people sum up Chritie's chaarcters as "to dimensional" I though Dr Kenendy was deeply complex and sinister.
I agree Miss Quin, I don't think that Dr Kennedy ever touched Helen either. She seems to have had quite a natural relationship with Gwen's father and there is no hint of her ever being damaged in the way we understand these days that child abuse victims are damaged and find forming normal healthy relationships difficult. I think that, as you say, Dr Kennedy was just warped in his feelings for her. No wonder she was scared of him.
Haven't seen the tv adapts, although if the Hickson one came on TV I might give it a go.
HUGE SLEEPING MURDERS SPOILERS!!
Ok, Dr Kennedy's feelings for his sister always seemed more that brotherly to me. When I first the book, I worked it out. The Duchess Of Malfi is a play that features brother-sister incest, so it's a subtle refrence.
I'm pretty sure that Dr Kennedy never acted on his feelings towards his sister. He did things to try and keep her indoors, to stop her having male friends round. I think Helen must have sensed something was wrong, so tried to escape by marrying anyone. I think Dr Kenedy's warped feelings festered away for many years, until the point came when he could'nt stand it any longer, so planned to kill her.
If he had abused Helen, she wouldn't have let him come round to see her anymore. Or told her husband. But if she had a hunch that something might be wrong about her half brother's feelings , but couldn't prove so, that makes sense.
The Mc Ewan version, in my eyes is very poor. It has many cheesey moments. The Hickson version is to start off with, very irritating. Gwenda and Giles are too cutesy for words. The final scene on the stairs is good. But overall I don't think any version has done proper justice to the book.
Anyway, look forward to hearing more from you Yunakitty!
Ten people, each with something to hide and something to fear, are invited to a lonely mansion on Soldier Island by a host who, surprisingly, fails to appear.
When the wealthy patriarch, Aristide, is murdered, suspicion falls on the whole household. ...
Travelling on the Orient Express, Poirot is approached by a desperate American. Afraid that someone plans to kill him, Ratchett asks Poirot for help ...
Masthead Photography: Joan Hickson image © BBC
MURDER MOST FOUL © Turner Entertainment Co. A Warner Bros. Entertainment Company. All Rights Reserved.
AGATHA CHRISTIE® POIROT® MARPLE® Copyright ©2009 Agatha Christie Limited. All rights reserved.
Newly married New Zealander Gwenda buys a house in Southern England and from the start there is something very familiar about the place - which is ridiculous as she has never been in England before. When strange and frightening things begin to happen it is just as well Miss Marple is on hand to stop Gwenda from going mad.
The accepted history of this book being written during WWII and put in a vault until its publication in 1976 is completely turned on its head in John Curran's book Agatha Christie's Secret Diaries in which he shows that it was probably written some considerable time later. What do you think about this? If the former was not the case why was it not published earlier?