For those of you wanting to discuss Agatha Christie's standalone books, such as And Then There Were None.
Beware spoilers and remember we'll be able to add the most insightful comments to the stories section.
If you can't find your favourite one, don't worry, we'll be adding them in the coming weeks.
Warning: These discussions may contain spoilers!
Login or register to add posts and reply
QuensionThe best book every I've read by Agatha Christie. I have to find the original one in English but it's hard around here in Turkey. :)
I've found the book in English. I love you, Agatha :)
I think women had at the time knowledge about poisons (Esa mentioned that Kait may have the knowledge due to some kind of activity as a housewife), and even Esa herself had the knowledge if she could discover what kind of poison the murderer used to kill her.
I think that historically it's pretty unusual physically that a woman would manage to kill 8 persons that inculded ,by the way, a strong young man who could easily beat her in a struggle and expose her. AC particulary tried to made the novel historically correct as possible, and that may seem to her unlikely too.
to Mr West- I don't think anyone knows who the original killer was intended to be. Plus AC went back and changed it, so it may even have been someone who was later a victim instead.
SPOILERS: If I had to choose a unlikely suspect it would be Kait. I think that wolud have been less obvious.
I'm wondering if the original murderer was a woman. But maybe due to historical accuracy, it would have been considered unlikely for a domestic woman/housewife to have knowledge of poisons??
A wonderful book. although the ending was disappointing, I really enjoyed reading it.
I found out that there is an alternative ending for the story, and I really want to know what is the original identity of the murderer.
during the reading I had three main suspects: Hori, Imhotep and Yahmose and also few other that I found out that is impposible that they are the murderer or I just stop suspecting them: Esa, Ipy Henet and Kameni.
Hori could easily done all the murders, he has strength and knowledge about poisons. He also had a strong motive, secret love to Renisenb. Maybe he wanted her to marry him but also he want to take control over the lands of Imhotep.
Imhotep himself didn't have any motive, but he just looks like someone who will surprise me if he will turned out to be the murderer.
Yahmose had motive and strength but no knowledge (so I thought) nor opportunity (in Ipy's death case, but while reading I thought that maybe Yahmose is facking his illness).
Another thing that I really want to know is, what happened then?
I mean, there are so many unfinished business:
What was Kameni's reaction about Renisenb choice?
How did Imhotep reacted after he discovored that the only son he still has was a brutal killer and is now dead?
and the seriously disturbing question:
what now? the whole family (Satipy,Yahmose,Ipy,Sobek,Esa,Henet and Norfret) are dead and there are only three people left in the house (Imhotp, who in my opinion will not be able to bear the sorrow and die, Renisenb and Hori), it's not horrible for them that all their family is now dead?
The best book every I've read by Agatha Christie. I have to find the original one in English but it's hard around here in Turkey. :)
I love two things in life: ancient egipt history and Agatha Christie books. So, of course, for me, this is THE PERFECT BOOK.
As far as I know, it's never been adapted for the screen.
Was Death Comes As The End ever made into a movie or TV program? I haven't been able to find it anywhere, but have heard that it had been done as a movie.
Is anyone else sad that this novel somehow got neglected in the "omnibus" editions? They are supposed to catalogue all of the non-series books, but seem to have missed this out.
The only reason I can think is that, in doing the omnibuses by decade, the publishers wanted to capture Christie's portrayal of England over the years, but still its sad that you can get all the other novels in omnibus form BUT this one!
That would have made a great book, I wish she had done it that way.
In Agatha Christie's Secret Notebooks, it is revealed that Christie originally planned the book as a dual mystery. A modern-day archaeological dig would have dug up a record of the ancient Egyptisan crimes, and then modern-day murders would have happened at the dig. The book would flash back and forth in time, as two different murder mysteries would complement each other.
No-one seems to know what the original ending of the book was, but some speculate that the murderer might in fact have been someone else. I find this hard to believe since it was obvious to me right after the murder of Nofret who the murderer was and the whole story is constructed to fit with this (and as always to throw you of the scent). Also the murderers very rarely get away in Agatha Christies stories, but of course justice might have been achieved in some other (possibly supernatural) way. So I think the alternative ending must have had something to do with which husband Renisenb chose (i.e. in the original ending she chose the other one). Agatha Christie's second husband was a man much younger than herself, which suggests that it might have been much more appealing to her that Renisenb should marry the lively young man (and choose life). Also eg in The Sittaford mystery her heroine chooses the "wrong" man (ie not the one you would expect at the end, and not the one that would be best for her from an objective pointof view) so this is not unlikely.
Oh wow, thank you, WandersFar! I have been puzzling over what this "alternative" ending that Agatha Christie wished she had kept could be, and all I could come up with was perhaps Hori doing them all and then killing Yahmose as he walked towards Renisenb (innocently) and claiming Renisenb was in danger, and then marrying her, the only remaining heir to Imhotep's wealth. And the novel could end creepily like that, where the reader was vaguely unsatisfied because the murderer got away with it. However, I like your ideas much better!
I will have to check with my Dad then.
It's not Hekanakht??
Found it Miss Quin Hakanhakt
I forgot to ask my dad today, I will write myself a note sorry Miss Quin.
Thanks 
I will do it tomorrow Miss Quin
Can you check the correct spelling please Tommy? I'm quite interested.
I don't know what the orginal ending was. But I don't know why she had to change it. It it was because it wasn't historically accurate for that character to kill someone, maybe it was orignally Henet.
Ten people, each with something to hide and something to fear, are invited to a lonely mansion on Soldier Island by a host who, surprisingly, fails to appear.
When the wealthy patriarch, Aristide, is murdered, suspicion falls on the whole household. ...
Travelling on the Orient Express, Poirot is approached by a desperate American. Afraid that someone plans to kill him, Ratchett asks Poirot for help ...
Masthead Photography: Joan Hickson image © BBC
MURDER MOST FOUL © Turner Entertainment Co. A Warner Bros. Entertainment Company. All Rights Reserved.
AGATHA CHRISTIE® POIROT® MARPLE® Copyright ©2009 Agatha Christie Limited. All rights reserved.
One of Christie's more unusual books, it is set in Egypt in around 2000 BC. Renisenb is mourning the death of her young husband and has returned to her father's house to be with her family. When he brings home the young and very beautiful concubine Nofret it isn't long before the family's strong dislike of her surfaces. Very soon Nofret's body is found at the bottom of a cliff, but did she fall, or was she pushed...
Is this just another Christie murder mystery or has she managed to give it a real twist by setting it in ancient Egypt. Is she allowed to get away with such a high body count because of the lack of police investigation?