For those of you wanting to discuss Agatha Christie's standalone books, such as And Then There Were None.
Beware spoilers and remember we'll be able to add the most insightful comments to the stories section.
If you can't find your favourite one, don't worry, we'll be adding them in the coming weeks.
Warning: These discussions may contain spoilers!
Login or register to add posts and reply
Ariadne Oliver makes for fun interludes in an extremely creepy, amazingly written book. The Pale Horse is my favourite of the non-series books (yes, beating even the perpetually-praised And Then There Were None). Agatha Christie writes so well, making the story increasingly more and more terrifying. The supernatural explanation seems to be the only one, the reader begins to feel. And then, with a crash, the entire scheme collapses, it is revealed for what it is; the reader can go out into the normal world, relieved; the supernatural horrors have been shut back into their box.
Then again, perhaps I'm biased, since mysteries that follow more or less such a pattern are my favourites? No matter; The Pale Horse is among the best detective novels of the 60s.
I'm in agreement with you ther, go leafs! This has been a favourite of mine for a long time although I was wary of reading it at first. But I was completely ensnared by the way AC weaved her story and the atmosphere she created. And it loses none of it's impact after years of rereading and listening to the audiobook. It's well plotted, is narrated well and mixes the everyday/commonplace with the supernatural to such an effect that it all seens beleivably terrifying.
Biased, go leafs? Why not! I am! And why? Because it's a GOOD book which lingers with you even after you finish it. It also has (possibly) the best line in an AC novel (in my humble opinion) but since it gives away the plot a bit, I won't repeat it!
As to the point about Mark and Mrs Oliver working as a team, I don't see it that way. Mrs Oliver isn't actively involved in trying to solve the mystery at all. In fact, she isn't even aware of what is going on. Yes, she gives Mark the significant link that helps him put everything together but she does that without realising it it the key that will unlock the problem.
It's great to have her in the book, along with Rhoda Dawes/Despard and the Dane Cathrops. Having the Vicar and his good lady in this book with Mrs O brings the two worlds of Marple and Poirot to a point where they finally touch. A nice touch from AC for all those who love her work.
Like I said, Mrs. Oliver appears in segments that read almost as interludes in the supernatural action. These are very fun to read, as Mrs. Oliver's scatterbrained mind runs around in a maze that makes perfect sense to her. It all hinges on the white cockatoo, of course!
Yes, tying Marple and Poirot together without having them actually meet was extremely clever of Agatha Christie. This way, we realize the two inhabit the same world, but we don't have to sit through a battle of wits between the two in which one of them will be made to look like a complete dunderhead.
The basic plot set-up of The Pale Horse (ie the 'supernatural' murder story) is very hard to make unsuccessfull. Some of my favourite mysteries ever follow this plotline: The Hound of the Baskervilles, The Three Coffins, The Sittaford Mystery, The Pale Horse, The House at Satan's Elbow, The Burning Court, etc.
Yes, the scenes with Ariadne Oliver lighten the mood slightly but also serve to make the supernatural feel of the book even more frightening. Thats why I love this book - it's constuction is brilliant. It makes the impossible seem frighteningly possible.
I agree thoroughly with your last two sentences, but am somewhat divided about the first. Yes, the book is frightening. But the scenes with Mrs. Oliver are like a breath of fresh air before the atmosphere stifles the reader. Perhaps later on, once the scene is done and you've dived into the eerie again, it is more frightening because of the contrast between it and the recent scene.
That's exactly what I meant, go leafs. Mrs Oliver lends the book a touch of normality (if that word can ever be used to describe the dear old thing!) and a glimpse of the wider world. Having these scences spaced throughout the book heightens the ever-increasing claustrophobic atmosphere present during the rest of the narrative.
Of course, as AC fans may know, two or three times, someone who read The Pale Horse was able to help catch a killer. One was the infamous "Bovingdon Bug".
I remember watching a TV drama about that case a few years ago, but I hadn't thought of the link between those deaths and the book until now.
I don't agree that Ariadne Oliver adds to The Pale Horse. I found her the only annoying person in the entire story which is one of my all-time favourites. Mrs Dane Calthorp was the perfect "Hastings" (though much more on-the-spot than Hastings!) for Mark Easterbrook; those two made a great team.
The move from the Supernatural into the clever murders was brilliant! A prime example of Agatha's talents.
Go Leafs
Thank you for the information about the Bovingdon Bug - I had never heard of him.
Found all the info on www.murderuk.com
I loved it! While reading it I was a bit annoyed with the supernatural stuff and then - WOW the solution! Great!
Ive just finnished reading the Pale horse.
It was quite creepy but I actually found Murder is Easy scarier. It would have been more sinsiter without Mrs Oliver and the Poirot and Marple charcaters. But that not might be a good thing.
I did work out the solution, but it was still very good.
One of her best late novels, definitely. The beginning and the ending are very good (I didn't mind miss Oliver at all), though I felt that more could have been done with the character of Mark. He starts of very promisingly, with his ruminations on the hint of danger in household noises - one of the best Christie beginnings - but soon starts to be pretty mediocre, with occasional flashes of originality. To liven his character up, more could've been done with his profession, which didn't really play any role in the plot. More could've been done with Ginger also, she's a bit of a generic_spunky_thing_01.
I liked the high themes introduced by the title and by mrs. Calthrop's participation in the narrative.
4/5.
I also wrote a more detailed review in August on that site, when I first read the book. Thanks to Dame Agatha for continuing to brighten my life so far.
I really enjoyed this book even though it is set in the 1960's but I think it makes time period more convincing because times were changing she has moved from the war-time periods of the 30's and 40's and onto the complex and strange world of the 60's. I was not prepared for what happened in the novel. I was shocked when I read of Father Gorman's murder. Then when the story shifts to the village of Much Deeping with the three ladies at the Pale Horse it became more serious and disturbing. The three women shocked me in that they believe in witchcraft and they enjoy it. When I got to the character of Mr. Bradley the lawyer I could not believe it that people would go to him and make a kind of bet determining when a person dies and how he goes to the three ladies to make that happen. When I read the scene where Mark attends the seance it was terrifying and creepy. I was surprised by the method for the murders and I was even more surprised by the identity of the leader of this gang who also turned out to be Gorman's killer. The witchcraft motif is very clever and shocking but it points out the evil that is loose in the world and how people can use that evil for their own purposes. But after the case is solved the world and everything is back to normal and Mark marries Ginger Corrigan. This is great. Do you think the title is appropriate. It does come from a quote from the book of Revealation in the Bible. Find the quote and tell me does this apply to the novel. I believe it does because it shows evil in two ways: 1. the mortal kind done by people and 2. the kind that is done by Satan who is totally evil and wicked. Also in the novel the good overcomes the evil.
I ordered a copy from Amazon but it's taking so long to arrive. Reading all these comments makes me want it even more!
Ive always found amazon super quick, so I'm suprised. Maybe it's down to where you live. Have you found out who the murderer is by reading this?
No, I just skim read it. I think Amazon depends on who's selling it, but it only cost literally 2 pence. (and £2 something for post and packaging, but that isn't what they were charging for the book.)
Oh, I understand, it's from amazon marketplace. I was talking about the brand new itmes. They come in about 1 day! Plus mega cheap.
It should come soon, though, since it was about a week ago from a seller in UK that I ordered it. I don't know a lot about Amazon, since I use eBay far more frequently... But getting back to the book, where does the title come from? Is it a quote, like some other ones?
Ten people, each with something to hide and something to fear, are invited to a lonely mansion on Soldier Island by a host who, surprisingly, fails to appear.
When the wealthy patriarch, Aristide, is murdered, suspicion falls on the whole household. ...
Travelling on the Orient Express, Poirot is approached by a desperate American. Afraid that someone plans to kill him, Ratchett asks Poirot for help ...
Masthead Photography: Joan Hickson image © BBC
MURDER MOST FOUL © Turner Entertainment Co. A Warner Bros. Entertainment Company. All Rights Reserved.
AGATHA CHRISTIE® POIROT® MARPLE® Copyright ©2009 Agatha Christie Limited. All rights reserved.
Mark Easterbrook knows all about Mogul architecture but little about investigating murder. Unfortunately he seems to be drawn towards the latter, and the three witches who inhabit the Pale Horse inn. Do they really have the powers they claim or could they be at the heart of these murders? Mark has to learn quickly who he can trust or he might be the next victim.
This book gives Ariadne Oliver her chance to shine without Poirot. Does she do the story justice? Do she and Mark Easterbrook make a good team?