Agatha Christie wrote nearly 160 short stories. This includes the recently discovered and published The Capture of Cerberus and The Incident of the Dog's Ball. She used many of the plots in later novels and plays. Here you can discuss each one.
We're pretty sure they're all here but if you notice any ommissions just let us know!
Warning: These discussions may contain spoilers!
Login or register to add posts and reply
Sparkling Cyanide (novel) is much better than Yellow Iris (short story). Changing the culprit was good but the removal of Poirot was better. That story just didn't need him! Just like I prefer The Hollow as a play rather than as a novel, I prefer Sparkling Cyanide to Yellow Iris. Like AC said that having Hercule in almost everything she wrote had become such a habit with her that she put him in to most of the things she wrote without even thinking about it!
Ten people, each with something to hide and something to fear, are invited to a lonely mansion on Soldier Island by a host who, surprisingly, fails to appear.
When the wealthy patriarch, Aristide, is murdered, suspicion falls on the whole household. ...
Travelling on the Orient Express, Poirot is approached by a desperate American. Afraid that someone plans to kill him, Ratchett asks Poirot for help ...
Masthead Photography: Joan Hickson image © BBC
MURDER MOST FOUL © Turner Entertainment Co. A Warner Bros. Entertainment Company. All Rights Reserved.
AGATHA CHRISTIE® POIROT® MARPLE® Copyright ©2009 Agatha Christie Limited. All rights reserved.
Yellow Iris was first published in 1937 and was later expanded by Christie into the novel, Sparkling Cyanide. She chose, as she often did, to revisit the story and changed the ending (and the culprit).
This is not the only change. Yellow Iris includes the detective Hercule Poirot but Christie chose to remove Poirot when expanding the story into a novel. Which do you prefer? Would the novel have been better had she not made these two changes?