Talk about everything Marple related here!
Login or register to add posts and reply
I think that's in sharp contrast to the Poirot books, where sometimes (not always), he's able to get enough solid proof to take the case to the jury. Also, the Murder at the Vicarage.
Report buttons coming (back) soon - apologies for the delay - and thank you for telling us about spam.
More spam. And no report button.
Surely if the Moerators are Moderating they should be aware of the spammers or why have them
I agree when you say she's a good literary creation but I couldn't disagree more when you say some Marple books are "uninspired" and "disapointing". Each and every one of Agatha Christie's books, Poirot or Marple or any other detective, has an amazing plot behind them and are works of genius. I think all of Marple's plots are brilliant. I respect that you have a different taste in plots as me though.
I think we just need to post and alert the moderators– hopefully they'll take care of the spam.
Spammers again. And I can't find the report button. Anyone?
I didn't read a Miss Marple novel.Which book must be my Miss Marple novel?
Oh oh. Spam alert! 
I have read them both, A Murder Is Announced is Excellent, I am listening to Murder At The Vicarage Francis Matthes playes the Vicar and Immelda Staunton plays his wife, she also plays Mrs Summerhayes on my version of Mrs McGinty's Dead
If you havent read "A Murder is Announced " then you don't know how good Miss Marple really is. You should read it. Also, the Murder at the Vicarage.
To answer your question kidsnextdoor, The Marple Books are Brilliant but can't be compared to the Tommy and Tuppence Books as those are Secret Service Spy Stuff.
She is one of the most famous of Christie's characters and has been portrayed numerous times on screen. Her first appearance was in a short story published in The sketch magazine in 1926.
I've never read any books about Miss Marple yet. Are they as good as Poirot, Tommy, and Tupence?
It is a sad day for True Agatha Christie Fans, Helen Hayes was American so that doesn't bother me, Instead of doing what they are doing they should be either making the Heroine someone who is a Fan of Agatha Christie especially miss Marple or a Decendant of one of the American Characters.
Have you hearsd the news? Some news travels fast and jaws may drop just as quickly. Breaking recently was the fact that Disney has done a deal and will 'reboot' the Miss Marple franchise. This involves the casting of Hollywood actress <a href="http://bytesland.com/view/Jennifer-Garner-HQ-Pictures">Jennifer Garner</a> in the main role. And yes, it is the role of Miss Jane Marple to which I refer. But the casting is not the main issue. It's the concept. For the Disney rebooted Miss Marple is a Marple revisited and redrawn: It's to be her younger self, it's to be modern day and finally it's to be set in America. Surely the magic of Marple lies in the fact she's a wise old woman, a keen observer of humankind with many years of quiet practice behind her! And taking all three together is simply a step too far(((
I am afraid I can't help disagreeing with you, I love the plots of the books and don't find them disapointing at all with the exception of 'They Do It With Mirrors' which is the only one I didn't like, I was at a disadvantage as I saw most of the Hickson Adaptations before reading te books but this ddn't spoil my enjoyment at all, I felt some are better than others, my Favourites being '4.50 From Paddington', 'Sleeping Murder' and my absolute favourite is 'A Murder Is Announced', I liked 'The Moving Finger' but I thought it was spoilt by the addition of Miss Marple towards The End, Part of Miss Marple's Strength is that she only appears in 12 Novels and afew short stories, which is where I think Agath Christie went slightly wrong with Hercule Putting him in 33 Novels there wqas more chance of her writing one which wasn't as good as others, there are more Poirot books which I wouldn't automatically reach for.
The above bit of spam is flattering, but it still fails.
I love the character of Miss Marple. Poirot is brilliant of course but because of her quiet nature i think Miss Marple's character has a much more subtle and beautiful touch to it. I agree that most of the plots she was given left me wondering how exactly she had come to that conclusion with the notable exclusion of A Murder is Announced. It is my favourite Christie novel and is very fairly clued. If you haven't read it you certainly should.
I also think that The Mirror Crack'd has such a beautiful ending. The conversation Miss Marple has with Mr Rudd at the end is so lovely and I feel that she had a lot of sympathy for him. When she quotes the poem in the last lines of the novel you understand how caring Miss Marple really is.
It's not about hard evidence, more about logic. In Fivе Littlе Рigs, Poirot most likely doesn't have enough evidence even to start the case, yet his solution convices you and feels inevitable. Compare to Pаddington, where Miss Marple clearly solves the case by divine guidance, with no explanations as to why she was sure that the killer is the person whom she accused as being such. I'm surprised that few people mind it - only me, Barnard and a couple of reviewers at amazon.com.
I just read John Curran's new book, and he brought up a point that I've never noticed. In almost every Miss Marple book, Miss Marple doesn't have enough hard evidence to lead to an arrest– she has to set a trap for the killer, or arrange circumstances so that the killer is caught in the act, with few exceptions. I think that's in sharp contrast to the Poirot books, where sometimes (not always), he's able to get enough solid proof to take the case to the jury.
Ten people, each with something to hide and something to fear, are invited to a lonely mansion on Soldier Island by a host who, surprisingly, fails to appear.
When the wealthy patriarch, Aristide, is murdered, suspicion falls on the whole household. ...
Travelling on the Orient Express, Poirot is approached by a desperate American. Afraid that someone plans to kill him, Ratchett asks Poirot for help ...
Masthead Photography: Joan Hickson image © BBC
MURDER MOST FOUL © Turner Entertainment Co. A Warner Bros. Entertainment Company. All Rights Reserved.
AGATHA CHRISTIE® POIROT® MARPLE® Copyright ©2009 Agatha Christie Limited. All rights reserved.
I like Miss Marple as a literary creation. The idea of a seemingly quiet and slightly irrelevant village spinster having a sharp mind and a great scent for evil strikes me as being very intriguing.
However, I find most books with Marple rather dissappointing and uninspired. 4:50 from Paddington is an archetypical example of it, with its "divine guidance" solution.
Sure, many Poirot and non-series books don't click for me also, but the are also some that I do like, and also some that are just brilliant.
I haven't read "A Murder is Announced", and "The Moving Finger" would've been good, had it not been marred by the fact that I've read it in Russian translation (AC in Russian is unreadable for me). "Sleeping Murder" was fine, but I wouldn't describe it as "brilliant". "Nemesis" had some good ideas, but was deeply flawed. Others were dissappointing for me.
So, does anyone else feel that Miss Marple was given few good plots and none of the brilliant ones?