Christie Talk

Christie Talk - Have Your Say - Discuss Marple

Discuss Marple

Talk about everything Marple related here!

Login or register to add posts and reply

Post title: Names in Muder Is Announced

(Contains spoilers!)

squatty-avatar

squatty on 03 Oct 2008 at 6:38 a.m. GMT

12 replies

Reverse order

 
curious-avatar

curious on 03 Oct 2008 at 5:24 p.m. GMT

Chee, I don't know, but her writing style is just brilliant! She must have known human psychology quite well to have written her books like she did?!

 
GKCfan-avatar

GKCfan on 06 Nov 2008 at 3:42 p.m. GMT

 
AndThenThereWasTim-avatar

AndThenThereWasTim on 12 Nov 2008 at 7:13 p.m. GMT

 
Tommy_A_Jones-avatar

Tommy_A_Jones on 21 Dec 2008 at 4:16 p.m. GMT

I think she is subtlely dropping a clue to give the reader a fighting chance and probably thinks "Let them have this because they might not be so lucky in future" Just a thought.

 
hobbit-avatar

hobbit on 22 Dec 2008 at 11:19 a.m. GMT

 
Marc_Anton-avatar

Marc_Anton on 22 Dec 2008 at 1:41 p.m. GMT

I guess it is more obvious in a film/TV-adaptation than in a book because there is more talk and senseless chatter in a book and you can easily 'hide' certain clues. A writer uses dialogue to give life and colour the characterisation of the persons (even when it has no relation to the actual plot), something that is achieved by acting and costumes in a film version. In an adaptation dialogue is an extra to the characterisation and every word (hopefully) counts for something. Perhaps a viewer listens better to the dialogue (and maybe uses the subtitle function of the DVD). So yes, more frequent use of THE WORD would have given the clue and perhaps the entire plot away.

 
S_Sigerson-avatar

S_Sigerson on 23 Dec 2008 at 1:32 a.m. GMT

Actually it would be more obvious in the book because you are reading the words. Whereas, when you watch something you are listening to the words and depending on how well you are listening and the person's accent you might not catch it. And subtitles do not help much because the go too quickly. When reading you see the words written out so it makes it much easier to spot the clue. First time I read this novel, after Dora was found dead I guessed who the murderer was.

 
squatty-avatar

squatty on 23 Dec 2008 at 6:20 p.m. GMT

It must be that I read very fast but I missed the clue every time in the book. For what its worth, I agree with Marc and believe it is harder to disguise a verbal clue in a film/TV adaptation, especially in this case where we are talking about someone's name. It is more noticeable on film because the person is either being spoken to or talked about

 
major_pallgrave-avatar

major_pallgrave on 31 Dec 2008 at 1:23 a.m. GMT

Also remember the person who was saying Letty and LOtty was in thestory something of a scattycharachter so the reader would be lulled into putting the distinction between the two names down to the charachters general scattiness. A safe sort of way for AC to drop her clue.

 
hobbit-avatar

hobbit on 31 Dec 2008 at 10:34 a.m. GMT

 
pegahorse-avatar

pegahorse on 05 Jan 2009 at 3:11 a.m. GMT

 
Tommy_A_Jones-avatar

Tommy_A_Jones on 06 Jan 2009 at 1:07 p.m. GMT

I think you are write S Siegerson, It is easier to noticre in a book because you are reading it yourself like when you want to learn something it's easier to mlearn if youn are doing the research yourself where as if you are watching something on Television or listening to something you can't go back unless ofcourse itn is a Video/DVD or Tape/CD.

Login or register to add posts and reply

Total visitors online: 50

Newest members: johndanmoon, AndSch77, victoriasymonds, janetyork, lakedweller, koukis