Talk about everything Poirot related!
Login or register to add posts and reply
Hello, sapphire.
I read "Dumb Witness" a couple of months ago...
The positives:
I liked how colorful the characters were even though I didn't care for most of their personalities, particularly Theresa she was just weird. But it was still nice to read about characters that have such a strong presence. But along w/ Hastings & Poirot my favorite was Charles.
**SORT OF A SPOILER**
And I thought it was great how Hastings ended up w/ the dog Bob.
**END OF SPOILER**
As for the negatives:
The plot was close to a classic Christie however the ending and reveal of who the culprit(s) was/were was extremely disappointing & the solution was far too easy. I also felt that the title of the book was a little off the mark. If I were AC I would have named it: "Murder at Littlegreen House"; that's more intriguing than "Dumb Witness". If it hadn't been for those factors I think it would have been on a "Cat Among the Pigeons" level, instead it's just on a "Sleeping Murder" level.
Overall, imho, I'd give it a 5/10.
I disagree with your evaluation of the negatives, Mole. I think that AC's move for the killer was quite daring, far from disappointing. After a certain event in the book, I stopped paying attention to that person as a potential suspect.
Also, I think "Dumb Witness" is more than appropriate, because of Bob, who, in a way, was the witness of the crime.
I really liked Dumb Witness, and would give it 3.5 stars out of 4.
TheMole- 'Dumb Witness' as it is now, has had many names previous to this; Poirot Loses a Client, Murder at Littlegreen House and Mystery at Littlegreen House . I don't particularly like the first, original title, Poirot Loses a Client, but I would prefer either of the middle two.
I rate this book 8/10. I think the book is really worth reading and has a great storyline. The solution can be a bit predictable and disappointing but I think the book is really well written and all the characters are interesting and "colorful"!:)
I think "Dumb Witness" is an excellent title!
I rate this book 8/10. I think the book is really worth reading and has a great storyline. The solution can be a bit predictable and disappointing but I think the book is really well written and all the characters are interesting and "colorful"!:)
I think "Dumb Witness" is an excellent title!
JobyElliottMartinTheMole- 'Dumb Witness' as it is now, has had many names previous to this; Poirot Loses a Client, Murder at Littlegreen House and Mystery at Littlegreen House . I don't particularly like the first, original title, Poirot Loses a Client, but I would prefer either of the middle two.
You are absolutely right, Joby! I guess that the title Murder at Littlegreen house must have seeped into my subconscious memory :0).
***Spoilers****
To go leafs: Don't you think that choosing Bella as the murderess and her persona, and station in life was much like Gerda in "The Hollow"? I think AC had so much more complex characters in DW that she could have chosen to be the culprit. IMO picking someone like Bella was taking the easy route.
To APM: I agree. The storyline is great!
This reply contains spoiler information. Show reply
This reply contains spoiler information. Show reply
Yes, I really liked it.
Ten people, each with something to hide and something to fear, are invited to a lonely mansion on Soldier Island by a host who, surprisingly, fails to appear.
When the wealthy patriarch, Aristide, is murdered, suspicion falls on the whole household. ...
Travelling on the Orient Express, Poirot is approached by a desperate American. Afraid that someone plans to kill him, Ratchett asks Poirot for help ...
Masthead Photography: Joan Hickson image © BBC
MURDER MOST FOUL © Turner Entertainment Co. A Warner Bros. Entertainment Company. All Rights Reserved.
AGATHA CHRISTIE® POIROT® MARPLE® Copyright ©2009 Agatha Christie Limited. All rights reserved.
hey guys!
plz give me ur opinion on 'Dumb Witness'.
thnx!