Please use this area for any Topics you feel don't fit in with other areas of the forum.
Login or register to add posts and reply
I've been wondering if the "Ordeal by Innocence" idea evolved from "Trial by Ordeal" procedure back in the Middle Ages..
I love the Title Ordeal By Innocense one of the proposed was Cat Among The Pigeons which would have worked Just as well.
I personally liked 'The Clocks' and haven't read 'Murder On The Links' or 'Three Act Tragedy' yet but I agree with you about the others Frnorfoe but like you I might read them again especially 'The Mystery of The Blue Train', 'Halloween Party' and 'Elephants Can Remember', three books I can't really remember but knew I didn't like them much, I am on the Last Chapter of a Book I will never read again and I ended last year on a book I will never ever read again (Although I was out of my comfort zone as it was a Science fiction book I was reading as IO read very few people finish it so mI wanted to see if I could) and my Sister gave me a Murder |Mystery I will never read again, I am thinking of never reading other books written by Authors whose books I have put on the list but I like Betty Rowlands Books and one of them I really couldn't get on with.
There are books by other authors which are on my "never re-read again" list but not many Agatha Christie books are on it. I've read all of Miss Marple's novels and short stories and none are on my list either. As for Poirot I think The Murder on the Links, The Mystery of the Blue Train, Three Act Tragedy, The Clocks, Hallowe'en Party and Elephants Can Remember come pretty close to being on the list. But then again someday I might read them again to remind myself why I disliked them so much in the first place!
That's the same for me, There are some books I really hated and wont read again, but at the Moment no Miss Marple's are on the List just about 4 Poirot's Definitely; 'Lord Edgware Dies, 'The Murder of Roger Ackroyed', 'The Big Four', Third Girl and maybe 'The Blue Train Mystery' all though I can't remember too much about it as I reads it such a long time ago. Some Non-series Books are also on the List; Endless Night, Passenger To Frankfurt and Death Comes On The End. I haven't read all the Books in any Catagory yet so only time will tell
I could read Nemesis again. too. in the future. I have a habit of re-reading books. Books I've loved, books I've liked, it doesn’t matter. I don't really like Nemesis and yet I've read it at least two-three times. The "never re-read again" sign is only reserved for books which I've really hated.
I agree with you Frndorfoe, but for me it isn't rmances it is Books where the Main Character is going on a Journey like Mark Wallington's The Missing Postman or if not a book with a journey a P.G. Wodehouse Book, I too have to care about the Characters to care wether they succeed in doing what they achieve, I did love the book and is one I will read again.
When I read a book I like to feel connected to the characters. I like becoming a part of the flow of the story. If I do not, I cannot enjoy the narration or the conclusion of the story. It does not matter if it is a murder mystery where injustices must be put right or if it is a romance where two lovers must unite (Hey that even rhymes!). Nemesis is one such a story for me. That's why I like it but do not love it.
You can dislike a person and still want injustices to be put right or else many Lawyers wouldn't be employed but I agree if you don't like some of the Characters of a book you can't like the book which is why I don't like Sparkling Cyanide, Endless Night and Death Comes At The End.
This reply contains spoiler information. Show reply
I suppose Michael and Verity are a side story, a story about a girl who rebels against an stifleing and Claustrophobic atmosphere who sees a man no relative would want as a relation who falls for a girl who thinks she can use him to escape and perhaps change him in the process. What loopholes the type of people the Characters were they would ramble so I didn't see anything wrong with them rambling, the characters were like the ones in 'Postern of Fate' which was also one of the very later books What did you mean by loopholes go_leafs?
Nemesis was... interesting. Omit the loopholes and its (at times) rambling nature, and it's one of the more interesting Christies.
Don't get me wrong. I love and adore Miss Marple and she is my favorite detective. Nemesis is just one of those stories Agatha Christie wrote during her final years. It tends to be a bit rambling. Also, the characters are not properly fleshed out. I just could not connect with Michael and Verity like one ought to with lovers. I felt dissatisfied and it left me feeling a bit cold. But that doesn't mean I hate it. It is just one of my less favorite Miss Marple stories.
winne, "Cat Among the Pigeons" implies that one of the people among the pupils and schoolteachers is dangerous.
What didn't you like about it Frndorfoe? I loved the book
I know what Nemesis means and I know that the title fits the story. It is very obvious. What I meant to say was that even though I liked the title I did not like the book. I was intrigued by the title but the story let me down.
This reply contains spoiler information. Show reply
There are several titles that I found intriguing. But the stories turned out to be nothing extraordinary. Elephants Can Remember being one of them. Nemesis is another one of them. There are some books which did live up to their names for me. Sleeping Murder, A Murder is Announced, A Pocket Full of Rye, Cards on the Table, Evil under the Sun, Cat among the Pigeons .etc. are some of them.
Do you mean the title of "Cat Among the Pigeons"? It's simple, really. The book even explains it. The students and teachers are like the "pigeons", but one of them is a "cat". Put a cat among some pigeons and see how many will stay alive.
I couldn't understand the explanation to it being the title Kelly but I loved both Book and the adaptation so I didn't let me spoil my enjoyment.
My favourite title is Cat among the pigeons.I read it because I wanted to know what was the relation between the title and the story.
In my country(Brazil), the titles are very similar to the originals,but eventually they changed the tilte of "And then there were none".The reason I really don't know.
In England,is "And then there were none" the title?Or the name has changed like in Brazil?
This reply contains spoiler information. Show reply
Personally, I am fond of titles that quote or make references to other work. "The Moving Finger", a reference to the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, is one of my favourites, not only because of the reference, but because of its relevance to the story, as the poison-pen letter writer shifts the finger of accusation from one person to another.
Another one of my favourites is "By the Pricking of My Thumbs". Macbeth happens to be my second-favourite Shakespeare play (right after Othello), and seeing that quote from Act IV immediately gave me an idea of the kind of atmosphere to expect from the book. I was not disappointed.
One more title I love is "Hallowe'en Party". It just sounds so childish-- what on Earth would Poirot have in common with something like this? And yet, as children have fun and play games, someone meets their death. It's intriguing.
Titles that have incomplete information often intrigue me. "The Clocks" is a good example, and so is "The Pale Horse". "What clocks? What about them? Why are they important? Why is the horse pale, and why is it important?" Those questions came into mind when seeing the titles by themselves.
Some titles, however, I'm not too fond of. Most of these are American retitlings of the British version ("The Patriotic Murders" is a particularly bad one, I find). However, of the ones AC came up with herself, "Death Comes as the End" must be one of my least favourites. "Of course it does!" I muttered to myself when reading the title, which may be the reason I put off reading it.
This reply contains spoiler information. Show reply
I like the titles which come from a nursery rhyme or literary quote. For example Five Little Pigs, Endless Night or The Mirror Crack'd from Side to Side. Well they are a lot but I like the ones that are taken from a nursery rhyme or literary quote as I already said.
My fave titles are Five Little Pigs and And Then Then There Were None.
my fav title is sad cypress.
My favourite titles are 'Five Little Pigs', "Sad Cypress', and 'why didnt they ask evans?'. Agatha uses nursery rhymes really well in her novels, and I love it.
Thankyou for reminding me squatty, I had forgotten all abiout that, I loved the book but loved the way in the Ustinov Adaptation Hastings appears with Ariadne Oliver after all she meets Battle and Race in the books so she mightn't as well have met him.
my fav titles are sad cypress, pocket full of rye and the moving finger
Winnebago, I do see the relevance of the title.
The folly was built by a man who had been presumed dead. I actually think the title is one of the biggest clues of this book
This reply contains spoiler information. Show reply
Anyone else thnik that 'Ordeal by Innocence' is a really grate title as well?
Interesting question. I hadn't thought, by I suppose the Marple novels do all have quite thematic titles. I'd be interested to know what 'They Do it With Mirrors' refers to (I haven't read the book myself).
To add some different ideas to the mix...
Murder Is Easy - sort of has moral resonance, I think. A perfect title for the book that follows.
Sparkling Cyanide - it's alliterative and sounds vey nice. Very creepy title for what I thought was quite a creepy book.
By the Pricking of My Thumbs - love Macbeth so it's an obvious choice for me. Hobbit, you mentioned on a previous thread (discussing the novel) that you didn't see the relevance of the title to the book. I sort of agree with you. There is, like you said, a connection between the demise of the murderer and that of Lady Macbeth, but it's only a slight similarity.
All great titles from Agatha though.
Squatty I agree with you, It is a long time since I have read 'One Two Buckle My Show' but I thought the way AC put the rhyme in the book was contrived, It is the blurb on the back that incourages me to buy a book, It might be the Title that makes me take it of the shelf but if I don't like the blurb on the back I but the book back on the shelf.
I think a title has to be arresting enough to make us take it from the bookshelf and buy it. However, once I've started reading the book, I tend to forget the title.
I do get a bit irritated by those nursery rhyme titles and the contrived way that AC sometimes tries to force them into the plot. I love Five Little Pigs but trying to link the five suspects with the five pigs from the rhyme is embarrassingly done
In case anyone is interested the quote from the poem (the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam) goes as follows:
The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all thy piety nor wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a line,
Nor all thy tears wash out a word of it.
It's interesting that a lot of the Miss Marple titles have a literary or double meaning. 'The Mirror Crack'd' is an obvious Tennison reference, and has an interesting significance in the novel. Similarly 'A Pocketful of Rye' has the creepy nursery-rhyme theme and 'Sleeping Murder' refers to the Old English proverb 'let sleeping murder lie' - an interesting moral question in the book (would it have been better to let the past stay hidden).
I always think the best books AC wrote are the ones which have several interlocking themes/questions which tie up at the end into a powerful knot - as opposed to the 'straight' detective novels.
Hobbit
Ten people, each with something to hide and something to fear, are invited to a lonely mansion on Soldier Island by a host who, surprisingly, fails to appear.
When the wealthy patriarch, Aristide, is murdered, suspicion falls on the whole household. ...
Travelling on the Orient Express, Poirot is approached by a desperate American. Afraid that someone plans to kill him, Ratchett asks Poirot for help ...
Masthead Photography: Joan Hickson image © BBC
MURDER MOST FOUL © Turner Entertainment Co. A Warner Bros. Entertainment Company. All Rights Reserved.
AGATHA CHRISTIE® POIROT® MARPLE® Copyright ©2009 Agatha Christie Limited. All rights reserved.
I recently re-read major pallgrave's thread discussing 'Why Didn't They Ask Evans?' and was reminded of the point that had arisen about the importance of good, capturing titles which say something about the work. I was wondering what other people's views were on this.
'Why Didn't They Ask Evans?' has to be one fo my favourite titles (though I found the book itself rather unexciting) because it, for me, completely captures the sense of mystery of the novel and the context in which it is said, for those who have read the book, is extremely grim and intriguing.
I also like 'The Moving Finger' (a quote from a poem I believe) as I found the multiple ways it applies to the book (different villagers pointing the finger of accusation at each other, the single finger used to type the letters, the symbolic 'moving finger' of the poison-pen writer etc.) rather clever.
What are your favourite titles? (please try and give reasons, if possible!)
Hobbit