Have Your Say

Non-series Books and Characters

Other Christie books discussions

The Pale Horse

go_leafs_nation 02 Nov 08 at 12:52 p.m. GMT

I've just reread another one of my favourite AC books, "The Pale Horse". I must say, this was perhaps one of Agatha's best. As in "The Sittaford Mystery" her risky experiments with supernatural elements are successful. The story had a very dark, menacing atmosphere to it.

The assembly of characters is an assortment of some of my favourites: Mrs. Oliver, the Calthorps, as well as two characters (don't want to spoil anything) from "Cards on the Table". It cleverly establishes that Poirot and Marple are in the same "world" without having them meet.

The plot was certainly interesting. Down to the last minute I was fooled. Of course, now I know how to ideally kill someone.  (Hopefully the coroner never read this book.)

The film adaptation, was sadly, very unfaithful, deleting some of the characters I found essential to the story. Yet, it was quite entertaining, and very effectively conveyed the supernatural tone of the book.

Login or register to add posts and reply

30 replies

Reverse order

Mr_Battle_Brent 13 Jul 11 at 10:18 a.m. GMT

I have just read The Pale Horse and I have a feeling that the character of Rhode has been in  Cards on the Table,and Calthorpes were also in another book! Is that true?

Mr_Satterthwaite 03 Feb 11 at 1:27 p.m. GMT

Finished 'The Pale Horse' last night. Excellent read and the ending was novel.

It actually had me doubting my views on the supernatural at one stage!

MissQuin 26 May 10 at 8 p.m. GMT

Bundle_

Do you like James Murray from The Sittaford Mystery, MissQuin?!

I just watched it, he's quite nice. But I do love Jonathan Firth more. Oh and JJ of course. I mean, when their on screen, I'm riveted. But James Murray, I think isn't quite up to their acting standard.

Tommy_A_Jones 30 Apr 10 at 4:59 p.m. GMT

I finished Reading The Pale Horse last night and all I can say is WOW!!, Gosh, WOW!!, My Goodness what a Terrific Book, Now that is what I call , AWESOME!!!, I think if they must Put MM in it they should take out Dane Calthorpe and keep Ariadne as at one point I thought Dane Calthorpe was acting Sleuth-ish so to me that would make sence. 

MissQuin 28 Apr 10 at 7:10 p.m. GMT

Oh I know him! I had a crush on him 10 years ago. I havent seen the Sitaford Mystery but I'm dying to now. :)

Yeah we both like Jonathan Firth, JJ Feild, Toby Stephens, now James. i wonder who else we both like?

MissQuin 28 Apr 10 at 6:59 p.m. GMT

I don't know him, I'll go ogle him on IMDB! Then tell you what I think..

Bundle_ 28 Apr 10 at 6:52 p.m. GMT

Do you like James Murray from The Sittaford Mystery, MissQuin?!

MissQuin 28 Apr 10 at 6:41 p.m. GMT

Paul? Odd. But JJ is the only reason I'll watch it! I hope Ive given them some scene ideas though! mmmm shirtless (sigh)

 Actually we like the same actors, we're love rivals! Joking mon ami.

I confess I'd have liked JJ in A Caribbean Mystery, on the beach. Nice scenery!

Bundle_ 28 Apr 10 at 6:23 p.m. GMT

MissQuin

Maybe they read the comments on here about JJ and thought "wow, let's bring him back, he's so popular?"

If that's the case then I guess I deserve a pat on the back for that one! If the producers are reading this too then it would be nice if  Osbourne went shirt-less!

BTW I read that Osbourne's first name will be changed from Zachariah to Paul! Which is strange when you think about it; I mean, why does his name have to be changed at all? And besides,  the name Paul w/ Osbourne has no ring to it.

MissQuin 24 Apr 10 at 4:19 p.m. GMT

I think they were planning the Pale horse for a while. That's why they cut out the witchcraft plot from Murder is Esey. They planned to use it in The Pale Horse.

Puffinjill 22 Apr 10 at 9:16 p.m. GMT

You and I both, MissQuin!!!!

MissQuin 22 Apr 10 at 3:03 p.m. GMT

I was watching a programme called The Forsyte Saga with Rupert Graves in. He was made to look years older and all blotchy. So aging up a younger actor to play an older character is as silly as it seems.

I'm pretty sure they'll mess up The Pale Horse and I can't forgive them for what they did to Murder is Easy.

Puffinjill 22 Apr 10 at 6:03 a.m. GMT

Yes, Lone wolf, I know they will! If they are going to change the characters, the motives and, probably, the whole plot, why not go the whole hog and rename it something completely different and not link it to an AC work at all? If they think their ideas are so much better, then surely they should have the confidence to write their own COMPLETELY original stuff and not use AC's name to give them a ready-made audience. I doubt it's going to bear much resemblence to the book I know and love!

Lone_Wolf 22 Apr 10 at 3:45 a.m. GMT

Why all the puzzlement? They're just rewriting the whole thingy, as usual.

MissQuin 21 Apr 10 at 7:03 p.m. GMT

I know, there doesn't seem much point in getting a young man playing an old one. I'm trying to find a reason...Unless they did a flash back sequence. I'm clutching at straws, just wondering why they didn't get a small, indescript older person to play Osborne. Maybe they read the comments on here about JJ and thought "wow, let's bring him back, he's so popular?"

If they read this board to check whose popular, Jonathan Firth will be brought in again!

Puffinjill 21 Apr 10 at 6:48 p.m. GMT

What's the point of casting a young and attractive actor if they then age him for the role or make him look less attractive? I don't think they will consider doing either of these things for a moment, MissQuin. There are plenty of extremely fine actors of the right age who would make a wonderful Mr Osborne but ITV thinks it knows best (even better than AC herself) and will probably play on the very obvious good looks of Mr Feild, rather than play them down.

As for losing faith in the adaptations, I lost mine years ago, MissQuin, so you are definately not alone. I still try as hard as I can to enjoy the Poirot adaptations as I loved the eariler ones so much but find it difficult to forgive the liberties recently taken. However, ITV's Miss Marple adaptations, regardless of who plays the lady herself, have been more than a step too far for this Christie fan.

MissQuin 20 Apr 10 at 3:44 p.m. GMT

What about the reverse ageing? Bundle, in her late teens or 20's is now a middle aged woman. I think characters of around the same age are best.

Maybe JJ Feild will be aged up for his role? or made to look unattractive (hard work).

I'm losing faith in adapts. I used to look forward to them, but now their such fodder for good moaning material.

Lone_Wolf 20 Apr 10 at 2:38 p.m. GMT

At that point, they simply need to change the title and the names of characters. It will be much more honest and it would encourage to judge their adaptions on their own (rather dubious) merits.

go_leafs_nation 20 Apr 10 at 11:13 a.m. GMT

I most heartily agree- JJ Feild quite simply does not belong in the role he was given. This is one of my very favourite ACs, precisely for its miracle problem and use of the occult and supernatural, as well as its wonderful fair play and a grand solution. Remove all signs of Agatha's ingenuity, and what are you left with?

But I am amused how, in the preview, it says Miss Marple attends the ritual burning to commemorate the burning of a witch. Does she join in with her favourite chants, too?

Puffinjill 20 Apr 10 at 6:56 a.m. GMT

This reply contains spoiler information. Show reply

This sounds like a ridiculous bit of casting to me. I just can't see why the powers that be have decided to cast a much younger man in this role, apart from the obvious reason that he is very attractive and this may encourage a larger female audience to watch. And if that is the case, they will probably alter the characters personality aswell and (if he is still allowed to be responsible for the same things as he was in the book) his motives will have changed too.

I'm not doubting for a moment that Mr Feild is a good actor and can make a good job of any role he has been given, but I am questioning why an actor so completely different from AC's vision of Mr Osborne is considered to be a good idea. The Pale Horse is one of my very favourite Christies and I am horrified that, yet again, the original work seems to count for nothing and making a sensational and pleasing-to-look-at adaptation seems to mean more.