Talk about Christie TV and Film here
Login or register to add posts and reply
she would've made a great Mrs. Boynton, now that I think about it. though i loved her in Death on the Nile. "The roasting afternoon sun will do wonders for those jaundiced jowls of hers." priceless.
squattyOh dear - Bette Davis in Murder With Mirrors was terribly sad. She must have been a few months from death and it really showed. I dont think it was ever specified in the Helen Hayes's Marples where she came from. It was always presented as some Transatlantic village somewhere. But I think that in all those 1980s TV movies, none of the American cast members ever attempted a British accent.
Four years from death, actually. She was quite a feisty lady
Helen Hayes was indeed a bit wasted in Murder is Easy; she had about one scene and was then bumped off after a minute or ten (but to be honest, that was all of Miss Pinkerton’s role in the book also). Did they bring her from the US just to film that little scene? The rest was filmed in Britain. Weren't there some other veteran English actresses around? I never found Hayes’ accent very convincing. And yes, it is available outside the USA; I have the DVD-box with all the Christies from that period. Murder is Easy is actually the best of the bunch, it has more atmosphere and the rest of the cast is rather good. Of all those Christies from the 1980s, this one looks the least dated.
This rule seems to be broken most often when an actor has done a Bond film. Likely as not, they'll be the victim! The only exceptions, I think, are Sean Connery in Murder on the Orient Express, Shirley Eaton in Ten Little Indians (60s) and Joanna Lumley in Marple: The Body in the Library.
I refer, of course, to Diana Rigg in Evil Under the Sun, Gert Frobe and Adolfo Celi in And Then There Were None (70s), Timothy Dalton in Marple: The Sittaford Mystery, Jane Seymour in Marple: Ordeal by Innocence, Lois Chiles in Death on the Nile, Britt Ekland in Endless Night.....the list goes on!
Remember that the Hickson Marples and the 'old' Poirots (up to Murder in Mesopotamia) hardly had any 'stars' at all, not even really big names. Only very reliable ensemble actors. The new Marples and the last 12 Poirots have some well known names (Joanna Lumley, Elliot Gould, Timothy Dalton, Derek Jacoby) but hardly what you call stars. Because of this the cast is sometimes a bit unbalanced because the 'names' have a tendency to show off and overact to live up to their reputation, especially when they are not cast as the murderer. Most often the murderer is someone who underplays the part and you hardly notice (acting wise) them: After the Funeral, Sleeping Murder, Third Girl. This has to do with how the character was originally created in the novel, but also with the fact that 90 minutes is hardly enough to flesh out all the characters, create atmosphere AND a believable plot line. Sigh....it is a hard job to make it perfect and please everybody, I know!
By the way, how do you create empty lines in the postings , is it only possible when you start a new thread? I normally write in paragraphs and use 'white lines' in my posts but when they are published on the website, they appear as one big text block.
As you can see, I found out by now. You have to create paragraphs with the edit-function AFTER you published you post. There is no other way (I guess?)
This reply contains spoiler information. Show reply
It doesn't always work but I can understand when you have a really interesting killer and a very complex motive, you need a very good actor/actress who can pull it of. It is the kind of performance when it is all over, you want it to see again and check if it was already 'all there' in the performance and you missed it because you were not really born to be a sleuth yourself. I hate it when the murderer is revealed and absolutely nothing in his/her acting performance indicated that there were evil actions behind the friendly facade. Of course a good murderer has a lot to hide but it is the fun of a dramatisation to spot the cracks in that mask of virtue. After all they are caught in the end, since he or she couldn't fool Poirot or Marple, so we like to get in too. It worked well in the two different adaptations of 'A Murder is Announced', less so in the TV-version of Towards Zero (the murderer was quite underwhelming).
Ten people, each with something to hide and something to fear, are invited to a lonely mansion on Soldier Island by a host who, surprisingly, fails to appear.
When the wealthy patriarch, Aristide, is murdered, suspicion falls on the whole household. ...
Travelling on the Orient Express, Poirot is approached by a desperate American. Afraid that someone plans to kill him, Ratchett asks Poirot for help ...
Masthead Photography: Joan Hickson image © BBC
MURDER MOST FOUL © Turner Entertainment Co. A Warner Bros. Entertainment Company. All Rights Reserved.
AGATHA CHRISTIE® POIROT® MARPLE® Copyright ©2009 Agatha Christie Limited. All rights reserved.
Over many years I have found that even if you don't know the story you can guess whodunnit in adaptations by applying the "biggest star in a minor role" technique.
All you need to do is look at the cast list and watch for a short time to judge the biggest star's air time and you can guess the ending.
It's not foolproof but works 90% of the time in my experience. It certainly worked with the new Appointment With Death and Nemesis. Well done to Midsomer Murders who had Joss Ackland (usually absolute proof the technique works) as the victim. That really threw me.
I think directors and those responsible for casting should be more imaginative and it would make trying to guess TV/film whodunnits more enjoyable.
Any thoughts or good exceptions to the rule?